TY  - GEN
AB  - The purpose of this study was to examine the construct validity of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR) as a method of evaluating clinical judgment.  The primary aims of the study were to examine the empirical evidence for two testable theoretical relationships present in the Tanner research-based clinical judgment model.  A secondary aspect of the study was the exploration of clinical judgment assessments made by faculty in comparison to those made by students.
AD  - Oregon Health and Science University
AU  - Sideras, Stephanie
DA  - 2007
DO  - 10.6083/M4V40S5Q
DO  - DOI
ED  - Tanner, Christine
ED  - Chair
ID  - 449
KW  - Computer Simulation
KW  - Nursing
KW  - Validation Studies as Topic
KW  - Students
KW  - Judgment
KW  - lasater clinical judgment rubric
L1  - https://digitalcollections.ohsu.edu/record/449/files/450_etd.pdf
L2  - https://digitalcollections.ohsu.edu/record/449/files/450_etd.pdf
L4  - https://digitalcollections.ohsu.edu/record/449/files/450_etd.pdf
LK  - https://digitalcollections.ohsu.edu/record/449/files/450_etd.pdf
N2  - The purpose of this study was to examine the construct validity of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR) as a method of evaluating clinical judgment.  The primary aims of the study were to examine the empirical evidence for two testable theoretical relationships present in the Tanner research-based clinical judgment model.  A secondary aspect of the study was the exploration of clinical judgment assessments made by faculty in comparison to those made by students.
PY  - 2007
T1  - An examination of the construct validity of a clinical judgment evaluation tool in the setting of high-fidelity simulation
TI  - An examination of the construct validity of a clinical judgment evaluation tool in the setting of high-fidelity simulation
UR  - https://digitalcollections.ohsu.edu/record/449/files/450_etd.pdf
Y1  - 2007
ER  -