@article{ETD,
      recid = {551},
      author = {King, Emily},
      title = {Redefining the gold standard for diagnosis and risk factor  analysis in cervical dysplasia},
      publisher = {Oregon Health and Science University},
      school = {M.P.H.},
      address = {2010},
      number = {ETD},
      abstract = {Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) diagnostic  methods are suboptimal due to  limitations in  reproducibility and accuracy, which affects clinical  management and  understanding of risk factors for CIN.  These limitations are especially relevant for the  histologic  diagnosis of moderate dysplasia (CIN 2). We  hypothesize that molecular markers, such as p16  and Ki-67,  may improve diagnostic reproducibility and accuracy and  also lead to a better  understanding of cervical cancer  epidemiology.},
      url = {http://digitalcollections.ohsu.edu/record/551},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.6083/M4NZ85N0},
}