TY  - THES
AB  - Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) diagnostic methods are suboptimal due to  limitations in reproducibility and accuracy, which affects clinical management and  understanding of risk factors for CIN. These limitations are especially relevant for the histologic  diagnosis of moderate dysplasia (CIN 2). We hypothesize that molecular markers, such as p16  and Ki-67, may improve diagnostic reproducibility and accuracy and also lead to a better  understanding of cervical cancer epidemiology.
AD  - Oregon Health and Science University
AU  - King, Emily
DA  - 2010
DO  - 10.6083/M4NZ85N0
DO  - DOI
ED  - Morgan, Terry
ED  - Advisor
ID  - 551
KW  - Diagnosis
KW  - Observer Variation
KW  - Papillomaviridae
KW  - Uterine Cervical Dysplasia
L1  - https://digitalcollections.ohsu.edu/record/551/files/552_etd.pdf
L2  - https://digitalcollections.ohsu.edu/record/551/files/552_etd.pdf
L4  - https://digitalcollections.ohsu.edu/record/551/files/552_etd.pdf
LK  - https://digitalcollections.ohsu.edu/record/551/files/552_etd.pdf
N2  - Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) diagnostic methods are suboptimal due to  limitations in reproducibility and accuracy, which affects clinical management and  understanding of risk factors for CIN. These limitations are especially relevant for the histologic  diagnosis of moderate dysplasia (CIN 2). We hypothesize that molecular markers, such as p16  and Ki-67, may improve diagnostic reproducibility and accuracy and also lead to a better  understanding of cervical cancer epidemiology.
PB  - Oregon Health and Science University
PY  - 2010
T1  - Redefining the gold standard for diagnosis and risk factor analysis in cervical dysplasia
TI  - Redefining the gold standard for diagnosis and risk factor analysis in cervical dysplasia
UR  - https://digitalcollections.ohsu.edu/record/551/files/552_etd.pdf
Y1  - 2010
ER  -