<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xml>
<records>
<record>
  <contributors>
    <authors>
      <author>Tsai, Matthew</author>
    </authors>
    <secondary-authors>
      <author>Ferracane, Jack</author>
    </secondary-authors>
  </contributors>
  <titles>
    <title>Changes in esthetic parameters of vacuum-formed retainers after staining and cleaning</title>
    <translated-title/>
    <tertiary-title/>
  </titles>
  <periodical>
    <full-title/>
  </periodical>
  <alt-periodical>
    <full-title/>
    <abbr-1/>
  </alt-periodical>
  <pages/>
  <section/>
  <volume/>
  <number/>
  <keywords>
    <keyword>turmeric</keyword>
    <keyword>Coloring Agents</keyword>
    <keyword>Orthodontic Appliances, Removable</keyword>
    <keyword>Curcumin</keyword>
  </keywords>
  <dates>
    <year>2022</year>
    <pub-dates>
      <date>2022</date>
    </pub-dates>
  </dates>
  <abstract>The objective of this study is to measure and compare initial, post-staining, and post-cleaning color, gloss and surface roughness of five different orthodontic thermoplastic retainer materials. Conclusion: For all VFR materials, staining and cleaning does not change contrast ratio, gloss, and surface roughness in a clinically significant manner. Turmeric is a powerful staining agent, and [Delta]E*00 for PE &gt; PP &gt; PU when stained. Invisalign Cleaning Crystals, Polident, and Retainer Brite do not differ significantly in effectiveness of stain-removal except for turmeric in certain cases, where Invisalign Cleaning Crystals were most effective.</abstract>
  <pub-location/>
  <publisher>Oregon Health and Science University</publisher>
  <issn/>
  <isbn/>
  <custom3/>
  <custom7/>
  <notes/>
  <work-type>Thesis</work-type>
  <electronic-resource-num>10.6083/rv042t808</electronic-resource-num>
  <urls>
    <related-urls>
      <url>https://digitalcollections.ohsu.edu/record/9972/files/Tsai.Matthew.2022.pdf</url>
    </related-urls>
  </urls>
  <language/>
</record>

</records>
</xml>